Monday, October 6, 2014

I am taking a Linguistics course and I am helping a ESL student correct her essay. In her sample essay she wrote "....It has been very hard for...

In order to explain a problematic construction to a student, it is better to try to focus on what the student is trying to express rather than correcting the construction to meet what the tutor believes the student is trying to express. In this way, the tutor gains information that allows the tutor to provide the student with an understanding of how to express a particular idea rather than merely fixing it for them. This is why you would want to focus on using metalinguistic terminology rather than just “correcting” the construction.


With regard to the particular construction, "It has been very hard for me getting adapted with the busy lifestyle," the issue is not that the use of continuous (or perhaps progressive) aspect is necessarily incorrect, but rather that the student is using a non-standard form to express this aspect. To better understand this, we need to break down the sentence.


In the sentence, “getting adapted” is not the verb, so the issue of continuous tense is not relevant. What is relevant is that the form is expressing what appears to be a progressive aspect. We can see this if we rewrite the sentence with the nominalization as the subject of the sentence (and correcting ‘with’ to ‘to’, which is a collocation error):



Getting adapted to the busy lifestyle has been very hard.



This nominalization is still non-standard, but it is easier to see the student seems to be trying to express a progressive aspect. The issue then is the non-standard use of ‘to get’. If we eliminate ‘to get’ and change ‘adapted’ from the participle to the gerund, ‘adapting’, we have:



Adapting to the busy lifestyle has been very hard.



This modification results in a better formed sentence, but perhaps loses some of the speaker’s intended meaning. Specifically, the loss of ‘getting’, even though it is non-standard usage, seems to change the sentence from a progressive to a continuous aspect (i.e. from something that was a process but perhaps is complete to something that is continuously ongoing). So, consider the following revision:



Becoming adapted to the busy lifestyle has been very hard.



Here, we see a progressive aspect expressed. This construction indicates that the process of adapting is perhaps complete now rather than continuously ongoing, which seems to encompass the aspect desired by the student in using the non-standard form ‘getting adapted.'


Finally, let’s change the sentence so that ‘it’ is again the subject, as in the original:



It has been very hard becoming adapted to the busy lifestyle.



Here, we can see the major problem in the original construction was not the type of nominalization, but rather the word choice of the nominalization. In this sense, we can see it as a collocation error, although I think it is not so much an error based on the expected combination of words as it is the student using ‘to get’ in its colloquial ‘to become’ or ‘to grow’ meaning (e.g. ‘getting stronger,’ ‘getting bigger,’  and ‘getting smarter’).

Sunday, October 5, 2014

What are two similarities and two differences between Cool Jazz and Afro Cuban Jazz?

While both technically fall under the banner of jazz, Afro-Cuban jazz and cool jazz tend to be pretty different. Afro-Cuban jazz can often be characterized by the use of extra percussion. Bongos, congas, and other percussive instruments were present in a way they had not been before. In fact, one of the major collaborations of Afro-Cuban jazz was between trumpet player Dizzie Gillespie and Chano Pozo, a percussionist. Cool jazz, on the other hand, tended to utilize a more strictly traditional jazz instrumentation, without any extra percussion.


Another difference between the two types of music is the tone and tempo. Afro-Cuban jazz is often very upbeat, whereas cool jazz tends to be more subdued and downtempo. Miles Davis' Kind of Blue, for example, is a seminal cool jazz album that features slow to mid-range pieces, none of which are as ebullient as something like "Afro-Cuban Suite."


The two genres have similarities, however. Both types of music make use of the instrumental solo. Again, compare Gillespie and Davis — both are hugely influential trumpet players who would take solos on their own songs. 


Another similarity tying the genres together is the pool of musicians who would play each. Since the jazz community is rife with collaboration, members of different groups often played in other groups as well. For example, Wayne Shorter was a saxophonist in Art Blakey's Jazz Messengers in the late 50s through the early 60s. In 1964, however, he joined Miles Davis' quintet, where he would play what was termed "free-bop," a genre-bending amalgam of different jazz styles that often bore great resemblance to cool jazz. 

In the story "Charles," by Shirley Jackson, what are three character traits that describe Laurie?

Laurie is violent.  Many of the things he is described as doing seem to be incredibly violent for a kindergartener.  Laurie does not seem to care that he is hurting others, but he seems to want to tell his parents about it.  If they realized what he was doing, they would be shocked.


Quote 1



The next day Laurie remarked at lunch, as soon as he sat down, “Well, Charles was bad again today.” He grinned enormously and said, “Today Charles hit the teacher.”



This shows that Laurie is violent because he hit his teacher, and does not seem to care that he got spanked for it.  He says he hit her because “she tried to make him color with red crayons.”


Quote 2



The third day—it was Wednesday of the first week—Charles bounced a see-saw on to the head of a little girl and made her bleed, and the teacher made him stay inside all during recess.



The fact that a little boy would hit a little girl with a see-saw is terrible.  I can’t imagine being Laurie’s teacher!


Laurie is defiant.  A lot of Laurie’s misbehavior is just defiant.  He refuses to do what he has been told do to, and he does things that he knows he should not do.  This is attention-seeking behavior.


Quote 1



“You know what Charles did?” he demanded, following me through the door. “Charles yelled so in school they sent a boy in from first grade to tell the teacher she had to make Charles keep quiet, and so Charles had to stay after school. And so all the children stayed to watch him.”



This quote shows that Laurie is defiant because he yelled and didn’t listen to the teacher.  He also does not seem to care about being held after school.  He probably made up the story of everyone staying to explain why he was late.


Quote 2


Laurie describes his reaction to the teacher’s “friend,” who came to show the class exercises.



“Charles didn’t even do exercises.”


“That’s fine,” I said heartily. “Didn’t Charles want to do exercises?”


“Naaah,” Laurie said. “Charles was so fresh to the teacher’s friend he wasn’t let do exercises.”



This quote demonstrates that Laurie would not even listen to other people who came into class. He was also violent again, kicking the man who tried to make him exercise.


Laurie is inventive.  After all, Charles is not real.  Laurie made him up to cover up his behavior. He wanted to tell his parents that he was getting in trouble at school, but did not want to own up to it.  He invented Charles so he could talk about what happened in a safe way.


Quote 1


Laurie makes up a description of Charles.



“He’s bigger than me,” Laurie said. “And he doesn’t have any rubbers and he doesn’t ever wear a jacket.”



Charles is even defiant in the description!  He doesn’t have rubbers or a jacket, like Laurie probably does.


Quote 2


Laurie’s mother asks the teacher about Charles.



“Yes,” I said, laughing, “you must have your hands full in that kindergarten, with Charles.” “Charles?” she said.


“We don’t have any Charles in the kindergarten.”



This is where we find out, along with Laurie’s mother, that Charles doesn’t exist.  Laurie made him up.  It is obvious from the teacher’s reaction to Laurie’s mother that the behaviors are real, but it was Laurie and not Charles who was doing them.  Laurie's teacher says he had trouble adjusting to kindergarten.

In Freak the Mighty by Rodman Philbrick, how does Freak impact Max's summer?

In Chapter 8, Max explains his typical summer before Kevin entered his life. He usually slept in as long as he liked, read comic books and watched TV all day. Kevin isn't about wasting a minute of life in the house, though. Once Kevin knows that Max can walk him around on his shoulders, quests are created each day. First, Max is awakened by Kevin each morning with loud banging on the bulkhead of his bed. "Get outta bed, you lazy beats!" says Kevin, "There are fair maidens to rescue! Dragons to slay!" (44). Then Kevin verbally annoys Max all through breakfast to get him out of the house more quickly. Finally, they go on quests. One of the first quests that the boys go on includes marching over the hospital where Kevin tells Max there is "The Experimental Bionics Unit" (51). He says they are creating a body for him, but not to tell his mother about it.


Then Kevin takes Max on a bigger quest in Chapters 10 and 11. First they meet at 3:00 a.m. to pull a wallet out of a storm drain. Next, they walk all the way to the Testaments to return the wallet to a criminally-looking couple named Loretta and Iggy. Max has never experienced so much life since he met Kevin! There are a few times that Max says that the summer actually turned out "cool," too. It would seem, then, that Kevin impacts Max's summer in a good way. 

What is a summary of "The Road not Taken" by Robert Frost?

A traveler comes to a fork in the road.  He looks at one path and follows it with his eye as far as he can until it bends into the forest.  Then he looks at the other path, noting that it is grassier, a fact which may make it a little more appealing, though it looks like about the same number of people have taken each path.  He comments that both of the paths are covered in fresh leaves, and he decides to take the second path (the grassier one), and he wonders if he'll ever be able to come back and take the first path (but he knows that it is really unlikely because of the way choices work).  He considers the future, when he will, at some point, describe this choice: he plans to say that, when faced with two paths (or two options, symbolically), he took the path that fewer people have traveled and that this choice has made a big difference in how his life turned out.  (In other words, he plans to lie.)

Friday, October 3, 2014

What are developmental stages?


Physical and Psychological Factors

The development of the human being from infant to child to adolescent to adult is a story of increasing physical, cognitive, social, and emotional adequacy in coping with environmental demands. Major observers of human development have added a key corollary concerning the nature and pace of this development: It occurs in stages.



Development in stages implies several features about the process. The first implication is that developmental changes are not simply quantitative but also qualitative, changes not only in degree but also in kind. With advancement to another stage, perceptions, thoughts, motives, and social interactions are fundamentally altered. A second implication is that development is uneven in its pace—sometimes flowing and sometimes ebbing, sometimes fast and sometimes slow and steady in apparent equilibrium. A third implication is that the order of the stages is invariant: one always moves from lower to higher stages. No individual skips stages; each subsequent stage is a necessary antecedent to the more mature or advanced stages to come. The invariant sequence is preordained by the biological maturation of neurological systems and by the necessary requirements of human societies.


Descriptions of development in terms of stages are found in the writings of many psychologists, especially cognitive psychologists, who are interested in age-related changes in thinking styles, and psychoanalytic psychologists, influenced by Sigmund Freud, who concern themselves with changes in the growing child’s emotional involvements. The most significant, influential, and comprehensive of stage descriptions of development are those of two seminal scientists, Jean Piaget
(1896–1980) and Erik Erikson
(1902–94).


Piaget, a cognitive developmental
psychologist, outlined a series of shifts in children’s cognition, their ways of thinking about and interpreting the world. They include the sensorimotor stage in infancy, the preoperational stage beginning in toddlerhood, the intuitive preoperational substage of the preschool child, the concrete operations stage of the school-age child, and the formal operations stage beginning in adolescence.


Erikson, who updated psychoanalytic theory, outlined a series of age-related shifts in motives and ways of relating to others, each one related to a psychosocial
crisis. These psychosocial stages include an infancy stage of trust versus mistrust, a toddlerhood stage of autonomy versus shame and doubt, a preschool childhood stage of initiative versus guilt, a school-age stage of competence versus inferiority, and an adolescent stage of identity versus role diffusion.


The approaches of Piaget and Erikson originated independently, each emphasizing different aspects of development. The stages that they describe, however, should be viewed as complementary. Since the social changes result in large part from shifts in the child’s thinking, the psychosocial stages of Erikson closely parallel the cognitive stages outlined by Piaget.


In infancy, a period lasting from birth to about eighteen months, sensorimotor cognitive development is initiated by rapid brain development. During the first six months of life, the nerve cells in the forebrain that control coordinated movements, refined sensory discriminations, speech, and intellect increase greatly in number and size and develop a rich network of connections. This neural growth makes possible dramatic progress in the child’s ability to discriminate relevant objects and to coordinate precise movements of arms, legs, and fingers in relating to these objects. The infant who was capable of only a few reflexes at birth by six months can grasp a dangling object. The infant who was born with very poor visual acuity by six months can recognize detailed patterns in toys and faces. The infant shows recognition and knowledge of an object by relating to it repeatedly with the same pattern of movements. During the first few months of life, the infant has very limited ability to recall objects when they
are not directly seen or heard and, in fact, will fail to look for a toy when it is not in view. Sensorimotor integrations, therefore, form the infant’s principal method of representing reality. Only gradually does attention span increase and does the infant acquire the capacity to think about missing objects. The capacity to keep out-of-sight objects in mind, the gradual appreciation of object permanence, is a key achievement of the sensorimotor stage.


The corresponding psychosocial stage of infancy is built around the establishment of trust, some sort of sustaining faith in the stability of the world and the security of human relationships. Crucial to the establishing of this trust is the stability of the infant’s relationship with a primary caregiver, most commonly a mother. Babies begin to pay special attention to the caregiver on a schedule determined by their cognitive development. The primary caregiving adult is among the first significant objects identified by the infant. Indeed, it appears that infants are wired to be especially responsive to a human caregiver. Infants of only two or three months of age find the human face the most interesting object and will focus on faces and facelike designs in preference to almost any other stimulus object. By the age of six months, infants clearly recognize the caregiver as special but for some time cannot appreciate that the caregiver continues to exist during absences. Thus, conspicuous anxiety sometimes occurs when the caregiver leaves.


It is little wonder that an infant perceives the caregiver as special. The human caregiver is wonderfully reinforcing to the infant. Relief from all kinds of pain, smiling responses to infantile smiles, vocal responses to infant babbling, soft and warm cuddling contact, and games all offer to the infant what is most craved. By six to nine months of age, the baby seems dependent on the caregiver for a basic feeling of security. Until the age of two or three, most infants seem more secure when their mother or primary caregiver is physically present. The relationship between the quality and warmth of infant-mother interactions and the infant’s feelings of security has been supported by voluminous research on mother-infant attachment.


By about age two, neural and physical developments make possible the advance to more adaptive styles of cognitive interpretations. Piaget characterized the cognitive stage of toddlerhood as preoperational. Brain centers important for language and movement continue to develop rapidly. Now the child can deal cognitively with reality in a new way, by representing out-of-sight and distant objects and events by words, images, and symbols. The child can also imitate the actions of people not present. Thinking during this stage remains limited. The child cannot yet hold several thoughts simultaneously in mind and manipulate them—that is, perform mental operations. This stage is, therefore, “preoperational.”


Erikson described the psychosocial crisis of toddlerhood as autonomy versus shame and doubt. This crisis results in part from the child’s cognitive growth. The preoperational child has acquired an increasing ability to appreciate the temporary nature of a caregiver’s absence and to move about independently. The toddler can now assert autonomy and often does so emphatically. Resistance to parental demands is possible, and the toddler seems to delight in such resistance. “No” becomes a favorite word. Since this period corresponds to the time when children are toilet trained, parent-child tugs-of-war often involve issues of bowel control and cleanliness. The beginning of shame, the humiliation that comes from overextending freedom foolishly and making mistakes, begins to serve as a self-imposed check on this autonomy.


Piaget characterized the thinking of three-, four-, and five-year-olds as “intuitive.” This thinking is still preoperational. Children can represent to themselves all sorts of objects but cannot keep these objects in the focus of attention long enough to classify them or consider how these objects could be regrouped or transformed. If six tin soldiers are stretched into three groups of two, the preschool child assumes that there are now more than before. Thinking is egocentric because children lack the ability to put themselves in the perspective of others while keeping their own perspective. Yet preschool children make all sorts of intuitive attempts to fit remembered events and scenes into underlying plots or themes. Fanciful attempts to understand events often result in misconstruing the nature of things. Children at this stage are easily misled by appearances. A man in a tiger suit could become a tiger; a boy who wears a dress could become a girl and grow up to be a mother. Appearance becomes reality.


Erikson characterized the corresponding psychosocial stage of the preschool child as involving the crisis of initiative versus guilt. The child’s new initiative is expressed in playful exploration of fanciful possibilities. Children can pretend and transform themselves in play as never before and never again. From dramatic play, the child’s conceptions of the many possibilities of the world of bigger people are enacted. The earlier psychoanalyst, Freud, focused particularly on how children experience their first sexual urges at this time of life and sometimes weave into their ruminations fantastic themes of possession of the opposite-sex parent and jealous triumph over the same-sex parent. To Erikson, such themes are merely examples of the many playful fantasies essential to later, more realistic involvements.


Piaget characterized the cognitive stage of the school-age child as the concrete operations stage. The child is capable of mental operations. The school-age child can focus on several incidents, objects, or events simultaneously. Now it is obvious that six tin soldiers sorted into three pairs of two could easily be transformed back into a single group of six. Regardless of grouping, the total quantity is the same. The formerly egocentric child becomes cognitively capable of empathetic role taking, of assuming the perspective of another person while keeping the perspective of the self in mind. In making ethical choices, the child can now appreciate the impact of alternative possibilities on particular people in particular situations. The harshness of absolute dictates is softened by empathetic understanding of others.


Erikson characterized the psychosocial crisis of the school-age child as one of competence versus inferiority. Now is the time for children to acquire the many verbal, computational, and social skills that are required for adequate adulthood. Learning experiences are structured and planned, and performances are evaluated. Newly empathetic children are only too aware of how their skill levels are perceived by others. Adequacy is being assessed. The schoolchild must not only be good but also be good at something.


The cognitive stage of the adolescent was described by Piaget as formal operational. The dramatic physical changes that signal sexual maturity are accompanied by less obvious neural changes, especially a fine tuning of the frontal lobes of the brain, the brain’s organizing, sequencing, executive center. Cognitively, the adolescent becomes capable of dealing with formal operations. Unlike concrete operations, which can be visualized, formal operations include abstract possibilities that are purely hypothetical, abstract strategies useful in ordering a sequence of investigations, and “as if” or “let us suppose” propositions.


Erikson’s corresponding psychosocial crisis of adolescence was that of identity versus role diffusion. The many physical and mental changes and the impending necessity of finding occupational, social, marital, religious, and political roles in the adult world impel a concern with the question, “Who am I?” To interact as an adult, one must know what one likes and loathes, what one values and despises, and what one can do well, poorly, and not at all. Most adolescents succeed in finding themselves—some by adopting the identity of family and parents, some after a soul-searching struggle.




Disorders and Effects

Stage theories define success as advancement through the series of stages to maturity. Psychosocially, each successful advance yields a virtue that makes life endurable: hope, will, purpose, competence, and finally fidelity to one’s own true self. As a final reward for normal developmental success, one can enjoy the benefits of adulthood: intimacy, or the sharing of one’s identity with another, and generativity, or the contribution of one’s own gifts to the benefit of the next generation and to the collective progress of humankind. Cognitively, maturity means the capacity for formal operational thought. Hypothetical thinking of this type is basic to most fields of higher learning, to the sciences, to philosophy, and even to the comprehension of such abstract moral principles as justice.


Advancement to each subsequent stage of cognitive development is dependent on both neurological maturation and a culture that presents appropriate problems. Adults who fail to attain concrete operational thought are considered intellectually disabled. A failure in neurological maturation is a frequent cause. Failures to attain formal operational thought, on the other hand, are not unusual among normal adults. Cultural experience must nourish advancement to formal operational thinking within a domain of inquiry by the provision of moderately novel and challenging but not overwhelming tasks. When people are not confronted with such complex problems within some domain, then abstract, formal operational thought fails to occur. Abstract ethical reasoning is a case in point. Cross-cultural studies suggest that concepts of justice that involve the application of abstract rules are rare in cultures where people seldom confront questions of ethical complexity.


Psychosocial pathology is evidenced by development arrested in one of the immature stages of psychosocial development. It results from a social environment that fails to foster growth or exaggerates the particular apprehensions that are most acute in one of the developmental stages.


The development of trust in infancy requires a loving, available, and sensitive caretaker. If the infant’s caretaker is unavailable, missing, neglectful, or abusive, the pathology of mistrust develops. The world is perceived as unstable. Close personal relationships are viewed as unreliable, fickle, and possibly malicious. Later, closeness in relationships may be rejected. Confident exploration of the possibilities of life may never be attempted.


Similarly, the apprehensions of each subsequent psychosocial stage can be exaggerated to the point of pathology. The toddler, shamed out of troublesome expressions of autonomy, may compensate for doubts with the rigidly excessive controls of the compulsive lifestyle. The preschool child can become so overwhelmed with guilt over playful fantasies, particularly sexual and aggressively tinged fantasies, that adult possibilities become severely restricted. The school-age child can become so wounded by humiliations in a harshly competitive school environment that the child becomes beaten down into enduring feelings of inferiority. An adolescent may so fear the risks of exploring the possibilities of life that future adulthood becomes a shallow diffusion of roles, a yielding to social pressures and whims unguided by any knowledge of who one really is.


The successful confrontation of the tasks of adulthood—finding a partner to share intimacy and caring for the next generation—are most easily attainable for adults who have overcome each of these earlier developmental hurdles.




Perspective and Prospects

Stage theories of development are found as early as 1900 in the work of American psychologist James Mark Baldwin and in Freud’s psychoanalysis. Baldwin, much influenced by Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, hypothesized that the infant emerges from a sensorimotor stage of infancy to a symbolic mode of thinking, an advancement yielding enormous evolutionary advantages. Freud, the Viennese psychoanalyst, based his conception of emotional development on what he called psychosexual stages. Progression occurs from an oral period of infancy, when sensory pleasure is concentrated on the mouth region, to an anal stage of toddlerhood, when anal pleasures and the control of such pleasures become of concern. When sexual pleasure shifts to the genital region in the three-year-old, the love of the opposite-sex parent becomes sexually tinged, and the child becomes jealous of the same-sex parent. Working through these so-called Oedipal fantasies was, to Freud, crucial to the formation of personality.


Neither Baldwin nor Freud and his followers were the sort of rigorous scientists most respected by scientific psychology in the mid-twentieth century. Far more influential in American psychology between 1920 to about 1960 were behavioral conceptions of the developmental process as steady, incremental growth. To behaviorists such as B. F. Skinner, becoming an adult was conceived as a process of continuously being reinforced for learning progressively more adequate responses.


The stage approaches of Piaget and Erikson were introduced to most American psychologists in 1950, the year that both Piaget’s Psychology of Intelligence and Erikson’s Childhood and Society were published in English. Piaget’s description of cognitive stages was much more complete than Baldwin’s earlier account and was much better supported by clever behavioral observations. Erikson’s thesis of psychosocial stages incorporated most of Freud’s observations about stages. Erikson treated the social environmental pressures intrinsic to each stage as events of primary importance and shifts in the locus of bodily pleasures as secondary.


By the 1970s, Piaget’s and Erikson’s accounts of stages were awarded an important place in most developmental texts. This influence occurred for several reasons. First, researchable hypotheses were derived, and most of this research was supportive. Cross-cultural comparisons suggested that these stages could be found in a similar sequence in differing cultures. Second, the theses of Piaget and Erikson were mutually supportive. The stage-related cognitive changes, in fact, would seem to explain the corresponding psychosocial concerns. Finally, these approaches generated productive spinoffs in related theory and research. In 1969, basing his work on the cognitive changes outlined by Piaget, Lawrence Kohlberg elaborated a stage sequence of progressively more adequate methods of moral reasoning. In 1978, basing her work on Erikson’s hypotheses about trust, Mary Ainsworth began a productive research program on the antecedents and consequents of stable and unstable mother-infant attachment styles.


The most recent challenges to cognitive and psychosocial stage theory arise from the alternative perspectives of biopsychology and information-processing theory. Some psychologists argue that biologically rooted temperament, rather than the social environment, affects both styles of attachment and identity formation. Not only do babies respond to caregivers, but caregivers respond to babies as well. A baby who begins with a shy, passive temperament may be more susceptible to an avoidant attachment style and more likely to elicit detached, unresponsive caregiver behavior. Temperament, it is maintained, is more important than psychosocial environment.


Information processing theorists have challenged the discontinuity implied by stage concepts. They suggest that the appearance of global transformations in the structure of thought may be an illusion. Development is a continuous growth of efficiency in processing and problem solving. The growing child combines an expanding number of ideas, increases the level and speed of processing by increments, and learns more effective problem-solving strategies. To select particular points in this continuous development and call them “stages,” they argue, is purely arbitrary.


The final research to settle the question of the ultimate nature of stages has not been performed. A psychosocial stage theorist can acknowledge the role of temperament but still maintain that loving, trust-creating environments are also significant in encouraging the child to apply temperamental potential in positive social directions rather than in angry antagonism or frightened withdrawal. At the very least, Piagetian and Eriksonian stage concepts have the practical usefulness of highlighting significant developmental events and interpersonal reactions to these events. The warmth of caregivers for infants, the later tolerance of children’s struggles to become themselves, and environments that present challenging problems appropriate to the child’s developmental level are vital to emotional and intellectual growth.


For some purposes, it may be instructive to break the achievement of cognitive and emotional growth into increments that can be seen as if under a microscope. For other purposes, it is instructive to go up for an aerial view to gain perspective on the nature and direction of such achievements. The aerial view is the contribution of stage theories of development.




Bibliography


Berk, Laura E. Child Development. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, 2013.



Bukatko, Danuta, and Marvin W. Daehler. Child Development: A Thematic Approach. 6th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Cengage, 2012.



Charlesworth, Rosalind. Understanding Child Development. 8th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth/Cengage, 2011.



Feldman, Robert S. Development Across the Life Span. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2011.



Ginsburg, Herbert, and Sylvia Opper. Piaget’s Theory of Intellectual Development. 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1988.



Hall, Calvin S., Gardner Lindzey, and John B. Campbell. Theories of Personality. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.



Karen, Robert. “Becoming Attached.” Atlantic Monthly 265, no. 2 (February, 1990): 35–70.



Miller, Patricia H. Theories of Developmental Psychology. 5th ed. New York: Worth, 2011.



Nathanson, Laura Walther. The Portable Pediatrician: A Practicing Pediatrician’s Guide to Your Child’s Growth, Development, Health, and Behavior from Birth to Age Five. 2d ed. New York: HarperCollins, 2002.



Parke, Ross D., et al., eds. A Century of Developmental Psychology. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1994.



Sternberg, Robert J. Psychology: In Search of the Human Mind. 3d ed. Fort Worth, Tex.: Harcourt College, 2001.



Whitebread, David. Developmental Psychology and Early Childhood Education. London: Sage, 2011.

How do The Pardoner’s Tale, The Clerk’s Tale, and The Miller’s Tale compare in The Canterbury Tales?

The Clerk of Oxenford can be viewed as an early feminist. He is chided for looking like a “maiden” and he attempts to convince his audience about the value that women hold in society. He maintains that women deserve happiness and decries the notion of “a suffering wife.”


To add a complex counterpoint to the Clerk’s idealism, the Pardoner seems to serve as a vessel for Chaucer to expose the Catholic Church’s hypocrisy. The Pardoner claims that he would take money from a vulnerable widow and her children. This implies that the church believes women are weak and deserve to suffer so that powerful institutions (run by men) can accumulate wealth.  


In contrast to the Pardoner, the Miller weaves a comic tale that celebrates women’s autonomy. The Miller seems to support the Clerk’s message and warns against attempting to control women’s behavior. John, the Miller’s Tale protagonist, attempts to control his wife and finds himself cuckolded and humiliated for trying to unearth “God’s secrets” and “his wife’s.”

What are hearing tests?

Indications and Procedures Hearing tests are done to establish the presence, type, and sever...