Saturday, May 18, 2013

Did the participants in the White House staff meeting think the evidence was clear and convincing that the North Vietnamese attacked the American...

There are a few ways to look at this question. There is evidence that suggests some people didn’t believe an attack had occurred. There is also evidence to suggest people may have believed an attack occurred. I will share both viewpoints and then let you decide.


There would be a reason why some people believed an attack had occurred. The intelligence report that was presented at the meeting omitted many of the communications that would have cast doubts about this event occurring. There was no mention of US actions in the Gulf of Tonkin. There also was no mention that we may have mistaken the sonar pings they detected as actually hitting the rudder of their ship instead of hitting North Vietnamese submarines. Thus, it is possible people may have believed there was clear evidence we were attacked by North Vietnam because they didn't have all the necessary information.


Some information could lead one to conclude no attack occurred. President Johnson privately had doubts that these attacks occurred. He felt the sailors might have been shooting at nothing. If the President had these views, it is reasonable to believe other people shared these thoughts. Additionally, some of the people involved in the military also had doubts about these attacks occurring. These concerns were communicated with the Secretary of Defense.


Based on this information, it is now your turn to decide.

Friday, May 17, 2013

How are superdelegates chosen?

Although the selection process of super-delegates is slightly different in the Democratic and Republican parties, in both cases, governors, senators and  Representatives from Congress comprise a large percentage of the super-delegates. Usually, former governors, former presidential nominees, prominent cabinet members and even business leaders with close ties to the party establishment will get seated as super-delegates.


Ultimately, the Democratic and Republican National Committees are the final arbiters of who gets to be a super-delegate and who doesn't, so if an individual is trusted or owed favors by the national committee of either party, that person can become a super-delegate, regardless of his or her qualifications or lack thereof. There is no formal election of super-delegates, nor is there any governmental oversight of the selection process, because the political parties are considered private groups, not public entities.


The selection process of super-delegates often occurs in private, or at the very least, it does not have to be made public. Due to the fact that this selection process is guided by each party's national committee, those national committees themselves can change the rules on how super delegates get selected, and the actual composition of the national committees can and do change from year to year. That means that the selection process of super-delegates can be changed with a simple vote of party insiders, so any criteria that may exist today could be gone in months.


The most important point to remember about the selection of super-delegates is  that whole point of having them is to give the party establishment a couterweight against the will of the people. The national committees of each major party invented super-delegates for the express purpose of reversing potentially bad decisions by their rank and file voters. If that sounds anti-democratic, it is because it is.


If the primaries do not yield a candidate acceptable to the party elite, then that party elite, through the use of their superdelegates, can override the will of the people. Consequently, the selection process of super-delegates reflects the will of the party establishment, not of voters at large.

What is attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)?


Introduction

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most extensively studied behavior disorders that begin in childhood. Thousands of journal articles, chapters, and books have been published on the disorder. There are a number of reasons this disorder is of such interest to researchers and clinicians. The two primary reasons are that ADHD is a relatively common disorder of childhood (it is regarded as a childhood disorder although it can persist into adulthood) and that there are numerous problems associated with ADHD, including lower levels of intellectual and academic performance and higher levels of aggressive and defiant behavior.








In national and international studies of childhood emotional and behavioral disorders, ADHD has been found to be relatively common among children. Although prevalence estimates range from 1 to 20 percent, most researchers agree that between 3 and 7 percent of children could be diagnosed as having ADHD. The fifth edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5
, published by the American Psychiatric Association in 2013, describes the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. To receive the diagnosis of ADHD according to DSM-5, a child must show abnormally high levels of inattention, hyperactivity-impulsivity, or both when compared with peers of the same age. The DSM-5 lists two sets of behavioral symptoms characteristic of ADHD. The first list contains nine symptoms of inattention such as “often has difficulty sustaining attention in tasks or play activities,” while the second list contains nine symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity such as “often talks excessively” and “often has difficulty awaiting turn.” To be diagnosed with ADHD, a child must exhibit at least six symptoms from at least one of the lists. Although many of these behaviors are quite common for most children at some point in their lives, the important point to consider in the diagnosis of ADHD is that these behaviors must be in excess of the levels of behaviors most frequently exhibited for children of that age and that the behaviors must cause functional impairment in at least two settings (for instance, at home and at school). Additionally, it is expected that "several inattentive or hyperactive-impulsive symptoms were present prior to age twelve."


Boys tend to outnumber girls in the diagnosis of ADHD, with the male-to-female ratio estimated at 2:1 to 9:1, depending on the source. ADHD boys tend to be more aggressive and antisocial than ADHD girls, while girls are more likely to display inattentive symptoms.




Associated Problems

There are a number of additional problems associated with ADHD, including the greater likelihood of ADHD boys exhibiting aggressive and antisocial behavior. Although some ADHD children do not show any associated problems, many ADHD children show deficits in both intellectual and behavioral functioning. For example, a number of studies have found that ADHD children score an average of seven to fifteen points below normal children on standardized intelligence tests. It may be, however, that this poorer performance reflects poor test-taking skills or inattention during the test rather than actual impairment in intellectual functioning. Additionally, ADHD children tend to have difficulty with academic performance and scholastic achievement. It is assumed that this poor academic performance is a result of inattention and impulsiveness in the classroom. When ADHD children are given medication to control their inattention and impulsiveness, their academic productivity has been shown to improve.


ADHD children have also been shown to have a high number of associated emotional and behavioral difficulties. As mentioned before, ADHD boys tend to show higher levels of aggressive and antisocial behavior than ADHD girls and normal children. Additionally, it is estimated that up to 50 percent of ADHD children have at least one other disorder, and the DSM-5 now allows ADHD to be included in a comorbid diagnosis with autism spectrum disorder. Many of these problems are related to depression
and anxiety. Many ADHD children also have severe problems with temper tantrums, stubbornness, and defiant behavior. It is also estimated that up to 50 percent of ADHD children have impaired social relations; that is, they do not get along with other children. In general, there are many problems associated with ADHD, and this may be part of the reason that researchers have been so intrigued by this disorder.


Researchers must understand a disorder before they can attempt to treat it. There are a variety of theories on the etiology of ADHD, but most researchers have come to believe that there are multiple factors that influence its development. It appears that many children may have a biological predisposition toward ADHD; in other words, they may have a greater likelihood of developing ADHD as a result of genetic factors. This predisposition is exacerbated by a variety of factors, such as complications during pregnancy, neurological disease, exposure to toxins, family adversity, and inconsistent parental discipline. Although a very popular belief is that food additives or sugar can cause ADHD, there has been almost no scientific support for these claims. Because so many factors have been found to be associated with the development of ADHD, it is not surprising that numerous treatments have been developed for the amelioration of ADHD symptoms. Although numerous treatment methods have been developed and studied, ADHD remains a difficult disorder to treat effectively.




Drug Therapies

Treatments of ADHD can be broken down into roughly two categories: medication and behavior or cognitive behavior therapy with the individual ADHD child, parents, or teachers. It should be noted that traditional psychotherapy and play therapy have not been found to be effective in the treatment of ADHD. Stimulant medications have been used in the treatment of ADHD since 1937. The most commonly prescribed stimulant medications are methylphenidate (Ritalin and Concerta), pemoline (Cylert), and dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine). As of 2014, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) had approved three nonstimulant medications to treat ADHD. Strattera was the first nonstimulant drug approved and is prescribed to both children and adults. Intuniv and Kapvay are approved for children ages six through seventeen. Behavioral improvements caused by medications include better impulse control and improved attending behavior. Overall, approximately 75 percent of ADHD children on stimulant and nonstimulant medication show behavioral improvement, and 25 percent show either no improvement or decreased behavioral functioning. The findings related to academic performance are mixed. It appears that these medications can help the ADHD child with school productivity and accuracy but not with overall academic achievement. In addition, although ADHD children tend to show improvement while they are on a stimulant or a nonstimulant medication, there are rarely any long-term benefits to their use and can, in general, can be seen as only a short-term management tool.



Antidepressant
medications such as imipramine and fluoxetine (Prozac) have also been used with ADHD children. These medications are sometimes used when stimulant medication is not appropriate (for example, if the child has motor or vocal tics). Antidepressant medications, however, like stimulant and nonstimulant medications, appear to provide only short-term improvement in ADHD symptoms. Overall, the use or nonuse of medications in the treatment of ADHD should be carefully evaluated by a qualified physician (such as a psychiatrist). If the child is started on medication for ADHD, the safety and appropriateness of the medication must be monitored continually throughout its use.




Behavior Therapies

Behavioral and cognitive behavior therapy has been used with ADHD children, their parents, and their teachers. Most of these techniques attempt to provide the child with a consistent environment in which on-task behavior is rewarded (for example, the teacher praises the child for raising his or her hand and not shouting out an answer) and in which off-task behavior is either ignored or punished (for example, the parent has the child sit alone in a chair near an empty wall, a “time-out chair,” after the child impulsively throws a book across the room). In addition, cognitive behavior therapies try to teach ADHD children to internalize their own self-control by learning to “stop and think” before they act.


One example of a cognitive behavior therapy, which was developed by Philip Kendall and Lauren Braswell, is intended to teach the child to learn five “steps” that can be applied to academic tasks as well as social interactions. The five problem-solving steps that children are to repeat to themselves each time they encounter a new situation are the following: Ask “What am I supposed to do?” and then ask, “What are my choices?” Concentrate and focus in; make a choice and ask, “How did I do?” (If I did well, I can congratulate myself, and if I did poorly, I can try to go more slowly the next time.) In each therapy session, the child is given twenty plastic chips at the beginning of the session. The child loses a chip each time he or she does not use one of the steps, goes too fast, or gives an incorrect answer. At the end of the session, the child can use the chips to purchase a small prize; chips can also be stored in a “bank” to purchase an even larger prize in the following sessions. This treatment approach combines the use of cognitive strategies (the child learns self-instructional steps) and behavioral techniques (the child loses a desired object, a chip, for impulsive behavior).


Overall, behavioral and cognitive behavior therapies have been found to be relatively effective in the settings in which they are used and at the time they are being instituted. Like the effects of medication, however, the effects of behavioral and cognitive behavior therapies tend not to be long lasting. There is some evidence to suggest that the combination of medication and behavior therapy can increase the effectiveness of treatment. In the long run, however, no treatment of ADHD has been found to be truly effective, and in a majority of cases, the disorder persists into adulthood.




History and Changing Diagnostic Criteria

Children who might be diagnosed as having ADHD have been written about and discussed in scientific publications since the mid-1800s. A focus on ADHD began in the United States after an encephalitis epidemic in 1917. Because the damage to the central nervous system caused by the disease led to poor attention, impulsivity, and overactivity in children who survived, researchers began to look for signs of brain injury in other children who had similar behavioral profiles. By the 1950s, researchers began to refer to this disorder as “minimal brain damage,” which was then changed to “minimal brain dysfunction” (MBD). By the 1960s, however, the use of the term MBD was severely criticized because of its overinclusiveness and nonspecificity. Researchers began to use terms that more specifically characterized children’s problems, such as “hyperkinesis” and “hyperactivity.”


The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), first published by the American Psychiatric Association in 1952, is the primary diagnostic manual used in the United States. In 1968, the second edition, called DSM-II, presented the diagnosis of “hyperkinetic reaction of childhood” to characterize children who were overactive and restless. By 1980, when the third edition (DSM-III) was published, researchers had begun to focus on the deficits of attention in these children, so two diagnostic categories were established: “attention-deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADD with H)” and “attention-deficit disorder without hyperactivity (ADD without H).” After the publication of DSM-III, many researchers argued that there were no empirical data to support the existence of the ADD without H diagnosis. In other words, it was difficult to find any children who were inattentive and impulsive but who were not hyperactive. For this reason, in 1987, when the revised DSM-III-R was published, the only diagnostic category for these children was “attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).”


With the publication of the fourth version of the manual, the DSM-IV, in 1994, three distinct diagnostic categories for ADHD were identified: ADHD predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type, ADHD predominantly inattentive type, and ADHD combined type. The type of ADHD diagnosed depends on the number and types of behavioral symptoms a child exhibits. Six of nine symptoms from the hyperactivity-impulsivity list but fewer than six symptoms from the inattention list lead to a diagnosis of ADHD predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type. Six of nine symptoms the inattention list but fewer than six symptoms from the hyperactivity-impulsivity list lead to a diagnosis of ADHD predominantly inattentive type. A child who exhibits six of nine behavioral symptoms simultaneously from both lists receives a diagnosis of ADHD combined type.


The eighteen criteria used in the DSM-IV to diagnose ADHD were carried over to the DSM-5, which was published and released in 2013. The wording criterion for onset of ADHD has been changed, however, from "some" of the inattentive or hyperactive "symptoms that caused impairment were present before age seven years" in the DSM-IV to "several" inattentive or hyperactive "symptoms were present prior to age twelve" in the DSM-5. The DSM-5 also added a reduced symptom threshold for adults with a minimum of five symptoms (as opposed to the six required for children) for both the inattention and the hyperactivity/impulsivity aspects of the disorder.


Although the diagnostic definition and specific terminology of ADHD will undoubtedly continue to change throughout the years, the interest in and commitment to this disorder will most likely persist. Children and adults with ADHD, as well as the people around them, have difficult lives to lead. The research community is committed to finding better explanations of the etiology and treatment of this common disorder.




Bibliography


Alexander-Roberts, Colleen. The ADHD Parenting Handbook: Practical Advice for Parents from Parents. Dallas: Taylor Trade, 1994. Print.



Barkley, Russell A. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. 3d ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2005. Print.



Goldstein, Sam, and Joy Jansen. “The Neuropsychology of ADHD.” In The Neuropsychology Handbook, edited by Arthur MacNeill Horton, Jr., and Danny Wedding. 3d ed. New York: Springer, 2007.Print.



Hallowell, Edward M., and John J. Ratey. Driven to Distraction: Recognizing and Coping with Attention Deficit Disorder. New York: Random House, 2011. Print.



Kendall, Philip C., and Lauren Braswell. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Impulsive Children. 2d ed. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.Print.



Parker, Charles E. New ADHD Medication Rules: Brain Science and Common Sense. 2nd ed. New York: Köehler Books, 2013. Print.



Ramsay, Russell J. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adult ADHD: An Integrative Psychosocial and Medical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2015. Print.



Wender, Paul H. ADHD: Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adults. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print.

What does the description of Crooks's room reveal about its inhabitant in Of Mice and Men?

The description of the room that Crooks inhabits in Of Mice and Men indicates that he is a man of some education and higher level thinking, he is fairly organized, and he has personal pride. His room is both workroom and living quarters, a place where he has lived in isolation for some time.


It is obvious that Crooks, marginalized because he is an African-American, creates his own little world in his quarters. He has several pairs of shoes and rubber boots, books, a dictionary, and a worn copy of the California civil code for 1905, which he has obviously studied. Near the books are a large pair of gold-rimmed glasses. There is also an apple box of wood above his makeshift bed of straw that accommodates his toiletries and medications, which are both for him and the mules and horses, along with saddle soap and a drippy can of tar. Scattered on the floor are a number of other personal possessions, an indication that no one else enters this room because these things have not been disturbed.



This room was swept and fairly neat, for Crooks was a proud, aloof man. He kept his distance and demanded that other people keep theirs. His body was bent over to the left by his crooked spine, and his eyes lay deep in his head.



From the objects in his room, it is apparent that Crooks has been on the ranch for years because he possesses many more things than the bindle stiffs do. Crooks is also alone a great deal since the other workers are boarded in the bunkhouse. While he must suffer from his back injury as the liniments attest, he also spends time reading. Further, he tries to improve himself intellectually because he possesses a dictionary. As a segregated man, Crooks studies the California civil code to be sure of his rights. For personal enjoyment, he has some lewd books and magazines above his bed. Yet, for all his possessions, Crooks's room is a lonely place.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

What is acupressure?


Indications and Procedures


Acupressure is an ancient Chinese procedure that uses pressure from the fingertips, knuckles, or a blunt-tipped instrument called a tei shin to stimulate points on the body. (The Japanese version is known as shiatsu.) The rhythmic, moderately deep massage is used to treat muscular pain, migraines, insomnia, backaches, and gastrointestinal and gynecological problems. The procedure can be performed by the patient and is beneficial for relieving chronic pain and increasing the range of motion by loosening tight muscles. Practitioners claim that acupressure can alleviate fatigue because it opens blocked energy pathways.





Uses and Complications

Acupressure works on the body’s organ, glandular, and muscular systems. Like acupuncture
, acupressure targets designated points on the body along lines called meridians. Meridians are not nerve pathways; rather, they correspond to energy pathways through which healthy Chi (pronounced “chee”) energy flows. (Chi is comparable to the Western idea of vitality or life force.) These body points are believed to correspond to various organs and body functions. Practitioners believe that when these points are stimulated, the balance of energy in the body is restored and the patient finds relief from physical illness or disease.


Muscle tension causes the large muscle groups to contract and so restricts the flow of Chi. The body is then out of balance, and the ability of the patient’s body to heal is inhibited. Acupressure massage seeks to increase blood circulation, relieve muscle tension, and unblock energy pathways.


Practitioners of traditional Western medicine believe that acupressure stimulates the release of endorphins, the body’s own chemicals that act as pain-blockers. Other benefits of acupressure have been recognized and accepted by traditional medicine. Acupressure is used in sports medicine to relieve muscle spasms and pain. The increased blood flow and muscle relaxation help to minimize possible or further injury to the body. Acupressure is often used in connection with other traditional Western medical treatments because no known risks are associated with the procedure.




Bibliography


"Acupressure, Shiatsu, and Other Asian Bodywork." American Cancer Society, March 1, 2011.



Bauer, Cathryn. Acupressure for Everybody: Gentle, Effective Relief for More than One Hundred Common Ailments. New York: Henry Holt, 1991.



Borimnejad, Leili, et al. "The Effects of Acupressure on Preoperative Anxiety Reduction in School Aged Children." HealthMed 6, no. 7 (2012): 2359–2361.



Cross, John R. Acupressure and Reflextherapy in the Treatment of Medical Conditions. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.



Gach, Michael R. Acupressure’s Potent Points: A Guide to Self-Care for Common Ailments. New York: Bantam Books, 1990.



Lee, Jeong-Sook. "Acupressure for Treating Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review." International Journal of Neuroscience 121, no. 8 (August, 2011): 409–414.



Meeus, Cathy. Secrets of Shiatsu. New York: Dorling Kindersley, 2001.



Saul, Helen. Healing with Acupressure. Chicago: Keats, 2002.



Teeguarden, Iona Marsaa. A Complete Guide to Acupressure: Jin Shin Do. Tokyo: Japan Publications, 2002.

In The Great Gatsby, how does Nick's relationship with the past contribute to the meaning of the novel as a whole?

In the first chapter, when Nick talks about his life before the war compared with his life after it, we get a sense that life was dramatically different then than it is now, after the war.  Nick says that he "came back restless.  Instead of being the warm center of the world, the Middle West now seemed like the ragged edge of the universe [...]."  To paraphrase the old adage, it really isn't possible to go home again.  In a way, Nick has lost his innocence; he's seen and done too much to be able to return to his former life and be his younger self, the self that thought home was everything.  He has realized that we can't turn back time, no matter how much we may want to, and so we must move on.


However, this is a lesson that Gatsby never seems to learn.  When Nick tells him that he cannot repeat the past, Gatsby cries, "'Can't repeat the past? [...] Why of course you can!'"  Gatsby continues to believe that no matter how much has changed, he and Daisy can still be together; never mind that she is now someone else's wife and a mother.  No matter that she has moved on because he has not.  Perhaps, if he'd been able to recognize that we can't turn back time or repeat the past, he wouldn't have continued to pursue Daisy, ran afoul of George Wilson, and ended up dead. 


Therefore, between Nick's recognition that one cannot return to the way life used to be and Gatsby's failure to understand this, we learn that one of the novel's most important themes is the impossibility of returning to a state of innocence or stopping the passage of time.

Explain how the Supreme Court justified the practice of segregating railroad passengers in Louisiana by race.

The Supreme Court case of Plessy v Ferguson was a very important one. Homer Plessy, a black man, sued because he claimed his rights were violated. He felt he should be able to sit in any railroad car. The state court in Louisiana ruled that the concept of “separate but equal” was legal. It was acceptable for separate railroad cars, based on race, to exist in Louisiana.


This case was appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the state court. The Supreme Court ruled that the “separate but equal” concept did not violate Homer Plessy’s rights. The Supreme Court ruled that this concept didn’t conflict with the 13th amendment that banned slavery. The Supreme Court said separation of the races did not suggest that any race was legally better or more important than any other race. The Supreme Court believed the 14th amendment was designed to prevent people from from legal inequality, not social inequality. In this case, the Supreme Court felt that Homer Plessy was treated as legally equal and, therefore, found no violation of the equal protection clause.


This “separate but equal” concept remained in effect until it was overturned in the Brown v Board of Education case in 1954.

What are hearing tests?

Indications and Procedures Hearing tests are done to establish the presence, type, and sever...