Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Suppose that the average price of goods imported from Great Britain increased. Is it likely that the value of the Australian dollar would...

If the average price of goods imported from Great Britain rises, and if all other things truly are equal, then the value of the Australian dollar will depreciate relative to the pound and the price in pounds of Australian exports to Britain will fall.


Exchange rates are typically determined by supply and demand.  In the scenario you lay out here, the demand for pounds will rise as will the supply of Australian dollars.  Both of these changes will cause the value of the Australian dollar to depreciate.  If the price of British imports rises, Australian importers will need to buy more pounds to pay for those goods.  They will pay for those pounds in dollars.  When they do this, the demand for pounds rises (they need more of them) and the supply of dollars also rises (more are being put out on the foreign exchange market to buy pounds).  We know that when demand rises, the price also rises.  Therefore, the price of pounds will rise.  We also know that as supply rises, prices fall.  Therefore, the price of dollars will fall.  As the price of pounds rises and the price of dollars falls, the dollar will depreciate and the price in pounds of Australian exports will fall.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Why does Macbeth decide to kill Lady Macduff and her kids?

Macbeth believes that Macduff is suspicious of him and he is trying to stop him from intervening. 


Macduff is a noble who is at Macbeth’s castle on the night he kills Duncan.  Macbeth is worried about the men who were there, including Banquo and Macduff.  He is concerned that they will be suspicious that Duncan’s murder was actually committed by the Macbeths.  When Banquo speaks up, Macduff agrees. 



Fears and scruples shake us:
In the great hand of God I stand; and thence
Against the undivulged pretence I fight
Of treasonous malice.


MACDUFF


And so do I.


ALL


So all.


MACBETH


Let's briefly put on manly readiness,
And meet i' the hall together. (Act 2, Scene 3) 



Macbeth therefore sends murderers after Banquo, his son Fleance, and the Macduff family.  Macduff happens to not be there. He is with Malcolm, the king’s son, who fled to England to gather an army to oppose Macbeth.  Therefore, the murderers kill Macduff’s wife and children.


Macbeth has no conscience.  He thinks nothing of killing men who think they are his friends, and their children (or wives).  He works with villains like the murderers because he does not want to get his hands dirty himself.  All he cares about is maintaining his throne now that he has it.


Macduff is with Malcolm when he learns what happened to his family.  He is horrified that he lost all of his family at one time.



All my pretty ones?
Did you say all? O hell-kite! All?
What, all my pretty chickens and their dam
At one fell swoop? (Act 4, Scene 3)



Malcolm tells him to “Dispute it like a man,” which basically means he has to fight Macbeth, and in that way he will accomplish their goal and avenge his family.  Macduff actually manages to hold it together pretty well. The witches have told Macbeth that he needs to beware Macduff, but they also said no man born of woman could hurt him.


When Macduff meets Macbeth in battle, he tells him that he was “from his mother's womb/Untimely ripp'd” (Act 5, Scene 8).  This subdues Macbeth, who gives up hope from then on.  Macduff beheads him, and Malcolm takes his spot as king.

What is the significance of Phoenix, AZ and other elements of setting in Alexie's story?

Victor has lost touch with his father. And in other ways, he has lost touch with his Native American roots. When he travels with Thomas to Phoenix, AZ, he reconnects with his father in a few ways. Victor literally goes back to collect his father's ashes and the truck. But he also needs Thomas to make this connection. 


Victor needs Thomas to give him the money needed for the trip. In reconnecting with Thomas and his (Victor's) father, Victor symbolically has a kind of rebirth or awakening. He has a better understanding of how to balance his allegiance to his ancestors while also being a modern Native American. The fact that this occurs in "Phoenix" is significant. This is an allusion to the mythical phoenix (a bird) which could burn to ashes and be reborn. Thomas "Builds-the-Fire" is the catalyst in Victor's journey. He starts the symbolic fire of Victor's journey and Victor is then reborn from his (again, symbolic) father's ashes. Prior to arriving at Victor's father's trailer, they take a flight. This also refers to the symbolism of the phoenix which would be reborn to fly again. 


Both Victor and Thomas plan to throw their portion of the ashes in the water at Spokane falls. The symbolism of the phoenix is the same here but takes the form of the salmon in Thomas' mind: 



I'm going to travel to Spokane Falls one last time and toss these ashes into the water. And your father will rise like a salmon, leap over the bridge, over me, and find his way home. 



These notions of rebirth, rising again, and reconnecting with ancestors are all thematic parts of Victor's journey. 

Who does Atticus defend Tom Robinson against throughout the trial in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus defends his client, Tom Robinson, against Bob and Mayella Ewell throughout the trial. Bob and his daughter both accuse Tom Robinson of committing assault and rape on the evening of November 21st. Mr. Gilmer is the prosecuting lawyer who opposes Atticus during the case and attempts to portray Tom as a guilty man. Atticus not only defends Tom Robinson against the Ewells and Mr. Gilmer, but he also defends Tom against the prejudiced jury and community. In the small town of Maycomb, Alabama, prejudice against African Americans is commonplace, and Atticus valiantly swears to defend his client against racial injustice. Despite Bob and Mayella's conflicting testimonies, lack of evidence, and Tom's obvious handicap, Atticus loses the case. The racist jury members convict Tom Robinson of assaulting and raping Mayella Ewell simply because he is black. Tom tragically becomes a victim of racial injustice.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

In Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lightning Thief, who unknowingly had the master bolt and who had the helm of darkness? What were the master...

In Chapter 19, Percy meets with Hades in the Underworld. He addresses Hades as 'Lord and Uncle' and tells him that he has two requests to make of him.


Hades is not amused that the son of Poseidon has dared to make any requests of him, but he decides to humor Percy. Percy's first request is that Hades return Zeus' master bolt to him in order to prevent war between the gods. Before Percy can get to his second request, however, Hades accuses him of having stolen both Zeus' master bolt and his own helm of darkness. Hades threatens to release the dead back into the world unless Percy returns his helm. However, Percy denies that he has Hades' helm of darkness and demands Zeus' master bolt back instead.


In reality, Percy was tricked into carrying Zeus' master bolt in his backpack; in Chapter 20, we discover that Ares had given the backpack to Percy. When Percy accuses Ares of having stolen both the helm of darkness and the master bolt, Ares admits cryptically that he had both items stolen, but he didn't do the deed himself. It was Ares who actually disguised the master bolt's sheath to resemble a backpack; since the sheath is so powerful that the bolt always has to return to it, Ares tinkers with the magic so that the bolt will only return to its sheath (the backpack) when Percy entered the Underworld. This is how Percy came to unknowingly have the master bolt in his possession when he stood before Hades.


Meanwhile, Ares has in his possession the helm of darkness. It is disguised as a ski cap,' the kind bank robbers wear.' When Ares deposits the ski cap between the handlebars of his bike, the cap immediately turns into a bronze war helmet. The chapter ends with Percy, the son of Poseidon, defeating Ares in battle. After changing into his immortal form, Ares vacates the scene of the battle and leaves the helm of darkness behind. Percy charges the Furies with returning the helm of darkness to Hades in the Underworld.

What is biosurveillance?


Definition

Biosurveillance is a systematic process of surveying the environment for viruses, bacteria, fungi, and other pathogens to detect disease in humans, animals, and plants. The process also characterizes outbreaks of such disease.






Overview

Biosurveillance combines disease surveillance with public health surveillance,
both of which depend upon data collection and analysis with the goal of early
disease detection to thwart a potential outbreak. Diseases may be defined by
incubation and infectious periods, source, and transmission route, while outbreak
characterization uses general analytic techniques, such as spatiotemporal
distribution, incidence, mortality, and cohort or case-control studies.
Biosurveillance proceeds from continuous data collection to confirmation of cases
with a feedback loop back to data aggregation. Environmental investigations
include food chains, vectors, weather, geography, the number of people who became
ill, and those at risk.


In the United States, the major use of biosurveillance is to track emerging and
reemerging infectious diseases such as H1N1 influenza, food-borne diseases
caused by resistant strains of Escherichia coli and
Salmonella, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs),
and human
immunodeficiency virus infection, which may also be
transmitted by contaminated blood products or through maternal transmission.


In the United States, government agencies conduct biosurveillance at the levels
of state and local health departments, which then report to federal agencies such
as the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a division of the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS). The CDC is responsible for collecting, analyzing, and distributing national
disease occurrence and mortality rates to state and local health authorities and
to the public. Other federal agencies conducting biosurveillance include the
Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and, globally, U.S. collaborative partners such as the
World Health
Organization (WHO), the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), and the South East Asia Regional Office (SEARO).


Before 2000, biosurveillance systems included the National Electronic
Telecommunications System for Surveillance (NTESS) and PulseNet, the national
subtyping network comprising state and local public health laboratories and
federal food regulatory laboratories that perform molecular surveillance of
food-borne infections. Systems in place after 2000 include BioSense and other
early warning systems, such as the Real-time Outbreak and Disease Surveillance
System (RODS).


Numerous decision-making tools, such as Bayesian
inference, may be applied to the detection of an outbreak of
infectious disease. The importance of the decision-making process cannot be
overestimated when providing alerts to the public. The costs versus benefits of
false alerts must be weighed against the goal of protecting the population at
risk.




Influenza Surveillance

The CDC maintains a comprehensive surveillance system for influenza
viruses, which mutate from year to year, requiring the collection and
characterization of varying types of pathogens. Flu vaccines have to be annually
updated in accordance with surveillance data to include relevant strains.
Treatment for influenza is determined by laboratory surveillance for antiviral
resistance. The impact of influenza on hospitalizations and mortality must also be
assessed.


The epidemiology and prevention branch of the influenza division at the CDC collects and analyzes information on influenza activity throughout the year in the United States. This surveillance results in “FluView,” a weekly report, which is issued from October through mid-May of each year. The influenza surveillance system is a collaborative effort between the CDC and its many partners in state, local, and territorial health departments; public health and clinical laboratories; health care providers; clinics; and emergency departments.


The CDC employs five categories of influenza surveillance: viral, outpatient influenza-like illness (ILI), mortality, hospitalization, and Flu-SurvNET. ILI is defined as a fever (100° Fahrenheit or 37.8° Celsius or greater) and a cough or sore throat (or both) in the absence of a known cause other than influenza. Flu-SurvNET provides population-based, laboratory-confirmed estimates of influenza-related hospitalizations. Each week, approximately eighteen hundred outpatient care sites around the United States provide data to the CDC. This data includes the total number of patients with ILI, according to age group. The data by age had confirmed, for example, that young people were more adversely affected by H1N1 influenza in 2009, relative to those age sixty-five years and older (when compared with seasonal flu).


Also included in national data are human infections with novel influenza A viruses, pneumonia, influenza mortality from the 122 Cities Mortality System, influenza-associated pediatric deaths, and Aggregate Hospitalizations and Death Reporting Activity. The Emerging Infections Program (EIP) is a population-based network of the CDC and state health departments that assesses the public health impact of emerging infections and examines ways to prevent and control these infections.




Viral Surveillance

Approximately eighty U.S. and WHO collaborating laboratories and sixty labs from the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) participate in influenza surveillance. The U.S.-WHO and NREVSS collaborating labs report to the CDC the total number of respiratory specimens tested and the number of positives for influenza types A and B each week. Reports from both U.S.-WHO and NREVSS are combined and presented in “FluView.”


Routine seasonal surveillance does not count individual flu cases, hospitalizations, or deaths (except for pediatric influenza deaths); rather, it monitors flu activity levels, trends, and viral characteristics through a nationwide surveillance system. The reporting of hospitalizations and deaths by state health departments was initiated at the start of the pandemic H1N1 outbreak in 2009. To avoid the underestimation of cases, the CDC altered this system and asked states to report both laboratory confirmed hospitalizations and deaths and presumed influenza or pneumonia deaths on cases coded as ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases). The CDC also created a Web-based data application for states to submit their numbers each week. This data is compiled for publication in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) and in “FluView.”




HIV and AIDS Surveillance

The annual HIV Surveillance Report
provides an overview of the most up-to-date epidemiology data on HIV infection in the United States and five U.S. territories. The CDC funds state and territorial health departments so they can collect data on persons with HIV infection; all personal identifiers are removed before data is transmitted to the CDC through a secure data network. Data are analyzed by the CDC and then displayed by age, race and ethnicity, gender, and transmission category, a significant change in the operation of the surveillance system. Moreover, the HIV Surveillance Report for 2012 (to be issued in 2014) marks the first time that data is included from each of the fifty states.


In 2008, changes were made to the case definition of HIV infection. To
accurately track the epidemic, emphasis is now be placed on HIV surveillance
rather than on acquired immunodeficiency disease syndrome (AIDS)
surveillance. HIV testing and linkage to care are essential for identifying
persons early.


Approximately 1.1 million persons in the United States are HIV-positive. The CDC used 2001 to 2009 data from the National Health Interview Survey to estimate percentages of persons age eighteen through sixty-four years who reported being tested (at any time) for HIV in the United States. Data from the national HIV surveillance system were employed to estimate cases and rates of HIV infection, AIDS diagnoses, and late diagnoses of HIV infection. In turn, these data were used to determine the populations and regions most affected by HIV and AIDS and to determine the trends in HIV testing and late diagnoses.




Food-borne Disease Outbreak Surveillance

Food-borne pathogens cause an estimated seventy-six million illnesses annually in the United States. Data from outbreak surveillance provides insights into the etiology of these illnesses, the foods in question, and their settings. State, local, and territorial health departments use a standard, Web-based form to report food-borne outbreaks to the Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System.


As reported to the CDC, 1,097 food-borne outbreaks occurred in 2007, which
resulted in 21,244 cases of illness and 18 deaths; of the single, laboratory
confirmed agents of outbreak-associated illnesses, 12,767 were caused by norovirus
(47 percent) and Salmonella (27 percent). In July, 2010, the CDC
collaborated with public health officials in several states and with the HHS, FDA,
and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection
Service to investigate a nationwide rise in S. enteritidis (SE)
infections. Investigators used deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis of SE bacteria
obtained through diagnostic testing to identify cases of illness. They also
identified restaurant and event clusters that may have been associated with this
outbreak. Investigators determined that eggs contaminated by
Salmonella were responsible for the outbreak. In late
November, 2010, following a recall and ban, the FDA issued permits to some of the
affected farms, allowing the resumption of egg sales.




Impact on Global Public Health

The age of public health globalization has arrived. Global health and global
health surveillance have come to the fore, in part because of newly emerging and
reemerging infectious diseases. In addition, climate change, poor hygiene and
sanitation, lack of economic and food security, political unrest, war, and
accelerating threats of bioterrorism have greatly increased global morbidity and mortality from
infectious diseases, especially in developing countries.


To counter these challenges, global health surveillance procedures have been updated. Changes were made to the new International Health Regulations (IHR), new global networks were developed, and specific guidelines to monitor emerging diseases and acts of bioterrorism were developed. Global surveillance now provides real-time information about potential outbreaks and epidemics.


Global response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic demonstrated the benefits of the new global monitoring systems and the importance of WHO in coordinating the global public-health community. As a result, valuable models were developed on how to respond to novel strains of influenza and other pathogenic entities, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus. As the number of cases H1N1 influenza cases increased and rapidly spread, it was apparent that significant resources, intervention, and biosurveillance at the international level would be necessary.




Bibliography


Burkle, F. M., Jr, and P. G. Greenough. “Impact of Public Health Emergencies on Modern Disaster Taxonomy, Planning, and Response.” Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2 (2008): 192-199. Examines disaster taxonomy and how it defines variability, unique characteristics, and classification of disasters. Also looks at how compromised publichealth infrastructure and systems may impact public health consequences, especially those that are “widespread, population dense, and prolonged.”



DeFraites, Robert F., and William C. Chambers. “Gaining Experience with Military Medical Situational Awareness and Geographic Information Systems in a Simulated Influenza Epidemic.” Military Medicine 172 (2007): 1071-1076. Examines the practice of medical situational awareness in integrating relevant medical and operational information to bolster decision making.



Giles-Vernick, Tamara, and Susan Craddock, eds. Influenza and Public Health: Learning from Past Pandemics. London: Earthscan, 2010. Discusses from a historical perspective the lessons learned from past flu pandemics about transmission patterns and successful (and not so successful) interventions.



Lazarus, R., et al. “Using Automated Medical Records for Rapid Identification of Illness Syndromes (Syndromic Surveillance): The Example of Lower Respiratory Infection.” BMC Public Health 1 (2001): 9. Discusses how information gleaned from automated medical records complements current surveillance programs by evaluating most episodes of illness for which no etiologic agent is defined.



Lober, W. B., L. Trigg, and B. Karras. “Information System Architectures for Syndromic Surveillance.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 5, suppl. (2004): 203-208. Describes the information-architecture components of a particular surveillance data system.Discusses existing and potential approaches to data integration.



O’Neil, Eileen A., and Elena N. Naumova. “Defining Outbreak: Breaking Out of Confusion.” Journal of Public Health Policy 28 (2007): 442-455. Illustrates the complexity of defining terms used to describe emerging and reemerging infectious diseases that have resulted in the use of emotionally charged terms such as “outbreak.” Argues that public health may benefit from strengthening the definitions of key terms.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

What are burns and scalds?


Causes and Symptoms

Burns are injuries to tissues caused by contact with dry heat (fire), moist heat (steam or a hot liquid, also called scalds), chemicals, electricity, lightning, or radiation. The word “burn” comes from the Middle English brinnen or brennen (to burn) and from the Old English byrnan (to be on fire) combined with baernan (to set afire). As of 2014, the American Burn Association reported that nearly a half million people recieve medical attention for burns each year, with over thirty thousand hospitalized in burn centers. According to the World Health Organization in 2015, globally, an estimated 265,000 deaths occur annually due to fires; fire-related deaths alone rank among the fifteen leading causes of death among individuals aged five to twenty-nine years (these figures do not include burns from scalding, electricity, chemicals, or radiation). Burns are most common in children and older people and in low-income countries; many burns are caused by accidents in the home that are preventable.



The depth of the injury is proportional to the intensity of the heat of the causative agent and the duration of exposure. Burns can be classified according to the agent causing the damage. Some examples of burns according to this classification are brush burns, caused by friction of a rapidly moving object against the skin or ground into the skin; chemical burns, caused by exposure to a caustic chemical; flash burns, caused by very brief exposure to intense radiant heat (the typical burn of an atomic explosion); radiation burns, caused by exposure to radium, x-rays, or atomic energy; and respiratory burns, caused by inhalation of steam or explosive gases.


Burns can also be classified as major or severe (involving more than 20 percent of the body and any deep burn of the hands, face, feet, or perineum), moderate (a burn that requires hospitalization but not specialized care, as with burns covering 5 to 20 percent of the body but without deep burns of hands, face, feet, or perineum), or minor (a superficial burn involving less than 5 percent of the body that can be treated without hospitalization).


While many domestic burns are minor and insignificant, more severe burns and scalds can prove to be dangerous. The main danger for a burn patient is the shock that arises as a result of loss of fluid from the circulating blood at the site of the burn. This loss of fluid leads to a fall in the volume of the circulating blood in the area. The maintenance of an adequate blood volume is essential to life, and the body attempts to compensate for this temporary loss by withdrawing fluid from the uninjured areas of the body into the circulation. In the first forty-eight hours after a severe burn is received, fluid from the blood vessels, salt, and protein pass into the burned area, causing swelling, blisters, low blood pressure, and very low urine output. The body loses fluids, proteins, and salt, and the potassium level is raised. Such low fluid levels are followed by a shift of fluid in the opposite direction, resulting in excess urine, high blood volume, and low concentration of blood electrolytes. If carried too far, this condition begins to affect the viability of the body cells. As a result, essential body cells such as those of the liver and kidneys begin to suffer, eventually causing the liver and kidneys to cease proper function. Liver and renal failure are revealed by the development of jaundice and the appearance of albumin in the urine. In addition, the circulation begins to fail, with a resultant lack of oxygen in the tissues. The victim becomes cyanosed, restless, and collapsed, and in some cases death ensues. Other possible problems related to burns include collapse of the circulatory system, shutdown of the digestive and excretory systems, shock, pneumonia, and stress ulcers.


In addition, particularly with severe burns, there is a strong risk of infection. Severe burns can leave a large area of raw skin surface exposed and extremely vulnerable to any microorganisms. The infection of extensive burns may cause fatal complications if effective antibiotic treatment is not given. The combination of shock and infection can often be life-threatening unless expert treatment is immediately available.


The immediate outcome of a burn is more determined by its extent (amount of body area affected) than by its depth (layers of skin affected). The “rule of nines” is used to assess the extent of a burn in relation to the surface of a body. The head and each of the arms cover 9 percent of the body surface; the front of the body, the back, and each leg cover 18 percent; and the crotch accounts for the remaining 1 percent. The greater the extent of a burn, the more seriously ill the victim will become from loss of fluid. The depth of the burn (unless it is very great) is mainly of importance when the question arises as to how much surgical treatment, including skin grafting, will be required. An improvement over the rule of nines in the evaluation of the seriousness of burns is the Berkow formula, which takes into account the age of the patient.


A burn caused by chemicals differs from a burn caused by fire only in that the outcome of the chemical burn is usually more favorable, since the chemical destroys the bacteria on the affected part and reduces the chance of infection. Severe burns can also be caused by contact with electric wires. As current meets the resistance in the skin, high temperatures are reached and burning of the victim takes place. Exposure to 220 volts burns only the skin, but higher voltage can cause severe underlying damage to any tissue in its path. Electrical burns normally cause minimal external skin damage, but they can cause serious heart damage and require evaluation by a physician. Explosions and the action of acids and other chemicals also cause burns. Severe and extensive fire burns are most frequently produced by the clothes catching fire.




Treatment and Therapy

General treatment of a burn injury includes pain relief, the control of infection, the maintenance of the balance of fluids and electrolytes in the system, and a good diet. A high-protein diet with supplemental vitamins is prescribed to aid in the repair of damaged tissue. The specific treatment depends on the severity of the burn. Major burns should be treated in a specialized treatment facility, while minor burns can be treated without hospitalization. A moderate burn normally requires hospitalization but not specialized care.


In the case of minor burns or scalds, all that may be necessary is to hold the body part in cool water until the pain is relieved, as cooling is one of the most effective ways of relieving the pain of a burn. However, the application of ice to a burn may cause more harm to the skin, as ice will restrict blood flow to the affected area and slow the healing process. If the burn involves the distal part of a limb—for example, the hand and forearm—one of the most effective ways of relieving the pain is to immerse the burned part in lukewarm water and add cold water until the pain disappears. If the pain does not return when the water warms up, the burn can be dressed in the usual way (a piece of sterile gauze covered by cotton with a bandage on top). The part should be kept at rest and the dressing dry and clean until healing takes place. Blisters can be pierced with a sterile needle, but the skin should not be cut away. No ointment or oil should be applied, and an antiseptic is not always necessary. Even minor burns can be serious if it covers as much as two-thirds of the body area. On a child, such burns are dangerous on an even smaller area of the skin, and special attention should be given to the patient.


In the case of moderate burns or scalds, it is advisable to use antiseptics (such as chlorhexidine, bacitracin, and neomycin), and the patient should be taken to a doctor. Treatment may consist of applying a dressing with a suitable antibiotic or an antiseptic or pain-relieving cream and covering the burn with a dressing sealed at the end. This dressing is left on for four to five days and removed if there is evidence of infection or if pain occurs.


For severe burns and scalds, the patient must go to the hospital. Unless there is a need for resuscitation, or attention to other injuries, nothing should be done on the spot except to make sure that the patient is comfortable and to cover the burn with a sterile cloth. Clothing should be removed from the burned area only if this does not traumatize the skin further. Burned clothing should be sent to the burn center, as it may help determine the chemicals and other substances that either caused or entered the wound. Once the victim is in the hospital, the first thing to check is the extent of the burn and whether a transfusion is necessary. If the burn covers more than 9 percent of the body surface, a transfusion is required. It is essential to prevent infection or to bring it under control. A high-protein diet with ample fluids is needed to compensate for the protein that has been lost along with the fluid from the circulation. The process of healing is slow and tedious, including careful nursing, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy. The length of hospital stay can vary from a few days in some cases to many weeks in the case of severe and extensive burns.


In some cases, depending on the extent of the burn, it will be necessary to consider skin grafting, in which a graft of skin from one part of the body (or from another individual) is implanted over another part. Skin grafting is done soon after the initial injury. The donor skin is best taken from the patient, but when this is not possible, the skin of a matched donor can be used. Prior to grafting, or in some cases as a substitute for it, the burn may be covered with either cadaver or pig skin to keep it moist and free from exogenous bacterial infection. Artificial skin holds great promise for treating severe burns.


In the case of chemical burns, treatment can be specific and depends on the chemical causing the burn. For example, phenol or lysol can be washed off promptly, while acid or alkali burns should be neutralized by washing with sodium bicarbonate or acetic acid, respectively, or with a buffer solution for either one. In many cases, flushing with water to remove the chemical is the first method of action.


Victims who have inhaled smoke may develop swelling and inflammation of the lungs, and they may need special care for burns of the eyes. People who have suffered an electrical burn may suffer from shock and may require artificial respiration, which should begin as soon as contact with the current has been broken.




Perspective and Prospects

Burns have been traditionally classified according to degree. The French surgeon Guillaume Dupuytren divided burns into six degrees, according to their depth. A first-degree burn is one in which there is simply redness; it may be painful for a day or two. This level of burn is normally seen in cases of extended exposure to sunlight or x-rays. A second-degree burn affects the first and second layers of skin. There is great redness, and the surface is raised up in blisters accompanied by much pain. Healing normally occurs without a scar. A third-degree burn affects all skin layers. The epidermis is entirely peeled off, and the true skin below is destroyed in part, so as to expose the endings of the sensory nerves. This is a very painful form of burn, and a scar follows on healing. With a fourth-degree burn, the entire skin of an area is destroyed with its nerves, so that there is less pain than with a third-degree burn. A scar forms and later contracts, and it may produce great deformity in the affected area. A fifth-degree burn will burn the muscles as well, and still greater deformity follows. In a sixth-degree burn, a whole limb is charred, and it separates as in gangrene.


In current practice, burns are referred to as superficial (or partial thickness), in which there is sufficient skin tissue left to ensure regrowth of skin over the burned site, and deep (or full thickness), in which the skin is totally destroyed and grafting will be necessary. It is difficult to determine the depth of a wound at first glance, but any burn involving more than 15 percent of the body surface is considered serious. As far as the ultimate outcome is concerned, the main factor is the extent of the burn—the greater the extent, the worse the outlook.


Unfortunately, burns are most common in children and older people, those for whom the outcome is usually the worst. Many burns are caused by accidents in the home, which are usually preventable. In fact, among the primary causes of deaths by burns, house fires account for the majority of the incidents. Safety measures in the home and on the job are extremely important in the prevention of burns. Severe and extensive burns most frequently occur when the clothes catch fire. This rule applies especially to cotton garments, which burn quickly. Particular care should always be exercised with electric fires and kettles or pots of boiling water in houses where small children or elderly people are present.


In the United States, most severely burned patients are given emergency care in a local hospital and are then transferred to a large burn center for intensive long-term care. The kind of environment provided in special burn units in large medical centers varies, but all have as their main objective avoiding contamination of the wound, as the major cause of death in burn victims is infection. Some special units use isolation techniques and elaborate laminar air-flow systems to maintain an environment that is as free of microorganisms as possible.


The patient who has suffered some disfigurement from burns will have additional emotional problems in adjusting to a new body image. Burn therapy can be long and tedious for the patient and for family members. They will need emotional and psychological support as they work their way through the many problems created by the physical and emotional trauma of a major wound.




Bibliography


"Burns." Health Library, September 30, 2012.



"Burns." World Health Organization. WHO, n.d. Web. 12 Feb. 2015.



"Burns: First Aid." Mayo Clinic, February 1, 2012.



"Fire Deaths and Injuries: Fact Sheet." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, October 11, 2011.



Glanze, Walter D., Kenneth N. Anderson, and Lois E. Anderson, eds. The Signet Mosby Medical Encyclopedia. New York: Signet, 1996.



Jeschke, Marc G. Burn Care and Treatment: A Practical Guide. Medford: Springer, 2013.



Landau, Sidney I., ed. International Dictionary of Medicine and Biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.



Leikin, Jerrold B., and Martin S. Lipsky, eds. American Medical Association Complete Medical Encyclopedia. New York: Random House Reference, 2003.



Marcovitch, Harvey, ed. Black’s Medical Dictionary. 42d ed. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 2010.



Miller, Benjamin F., Claire Brackman Keane, and Marie T. O’Toole. Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health. Rev. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier, 2005.



Sheridan, Robert Leo. Burns: A Practical Approach to Immediate Treatment and Long-Term Care. London: Manson Publishing, 2012.

What are hearing tests?

Indications and Procedures Hearing tests are done to establish the presence, type, and sever...